Difference between revisions of "Page:The-higher-powers.pdf/13"

From En JW United
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Page statusPage status
-
Not proofread
+
Proofread
Page body (to be transcluded):Page body (to be transcluded):
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{raw:data:ai|3|JUNE 1, 1929|The WATCH TOWER|173}}
 
{{raw:data:ai|3|JUNE 1, 1929|The WATCH TOWER|173}}
 
+
{{raw:data:c| the city of Jerusalem. It was a deep valley with a high and precipitous cliff on the Jerusalem side. Not only was all waste and rubbish burned here, but also the carcasses of dead animals, such as cats, dogs, horses, etc., were thrown into this valley, to be destroyed. The city ordinance was that nothing that had life should be cast into the valley. Thus we can see that it could not possibly represent eternal torment, because nothing that had life was ever cast into it. History also tells us that the dead bodies of the worst criminals were denied a proper burial and were likewise thrown into this valley and there completely destroyed.
the city of Jerusalem. It was a deep valley with a high and precipitous cliff on the Jerusalem side. Not only was all waste and rubbish burned here, but also the carcasses of dead animals, such as cats, dogs, horses, etc., were thrown into this valley, to be destroyed. The city ordinance was that nothing that had life should be cast into the valley. Thus we can see that it could not possibly represent eternal torment, because nothing that had life was ever cast into it. History also tells us that the dead bodies of the worst criminals were denied a proper burial and were likewise thrown into this valley and there completely destroyed.
 
 
To destroy this rubbish and these carcasses, a fire was always kept burning there. Many cities in the United States have just such places for the destruction of the rubbish of the city at the present time. The speaker has seen several of them, and each one has always been a valley or some depression. The dead carcasses and other waste matter thrown into these valleys would breed pestilence, and so it was customary to sprinkle brimstone over these, which not only served as a disinfectant but also hastened the complete destruction of the carcasses, since brimstone will burn more destructively than any other known substance.
 
To destroy this rubbish and these carcasses, a fire was always kept burning there. Many cities in the United States have just such places for the destruction of the rubbish of the city at the present time. The speaker has seen several of them, and each one has always been a valley or some depression. The dead carcasses and other waste matter thrown into these valleys would breed pestilence, and so it was customary to sprinkle brimstone over these, which not only served as a disinfectant but also hastened the complete destruction of the carcasses, since brimstone will burn more destructively than any other known substance.
 
This fire was not permitted to be quenched. To quench a fire means to forcibly put it out. When a fire burns up everything and goes out for the reason that there is nothing more to burn, that fire is not a quenched fire. Let it be noted, then, that when Jesus spoke of 'the fire that is never quenched', he did not mean that the fire would never go out, but he did mean that nobody would be permitted to put it out, to quench it. Thus, we can see that this fire pictures the complete destruction of that which was put into
 
This fire was not permitted to be quenched. To quench a fire means to forcibly put it out. When a fire burns up everything and goes out for the reason that there is nothing more to burn, that fire is not a quenched fire. Let it be noted, then, that when Jesus spoke of 'the fire that is never quenched', he did not mean that the fire would never go out, but he did mean that nobody would be permitted to put it out, to quench it. Thus, we can see that this fire pictures the complete destruction of that which was put into
 
the fire, and thus becomes the best possible picture of the "everlasting destruction" of all those wilful sinners who are to be destroyed in the second death.
 
the fire, and thus becomes the best possible picture of the "everlasting destruction" of all those wilful sinners who are to be destroyed in the second death.
 
+
This fire that is never quenched is identically the same thing as the lake of fire and brimstone mentioned several times in Revelation. And in most
This fire that iN llev<:,r quenched is identically the
+
positive language the lake of fire and brimstone is declared to be "the second death". - Rev. 20:14; 21:8.
same thing as the lake of fire and brimstone mentiollPd several times in Rewlation. And in most
+
Now note the fact that sheol, of the Old Testament, and hades, of the New Testament, both correctly translated "hell" and "grave", refer to the Adamic
positive language the lake of fire and brimstone is
+
death, while gehenna, of the New Testament, is a picture or illustration of the second death, which means everlasting destruction or annihilation.
declared to be' ·the second death ".-Hev. 20: 1-1; 21: 8.
+
What is the particular difference between Adamic and second death? The answer is that Adamic death is temporary destruction, likened to sleep, because a sleeping person generally awakens. Many texts speak of the Adamic death as sleep. The seeond death is never called sleep, for the reason that there is no awakening from the second death, and not even a  
Now note the faet that sheal, of the Old Testament,
+
|
and hades, of the New Testament, both eorrectly
+
promise or any hope of a resurrection for those who go into it. They are completely and for ever destroyed, and the apostle speaks of this as everlasting destruction. On the other hand, all who die the Adamic death, and go into sheol or hades, will be awakened.
translated" hell" and" grave ", refer to the :damic
+
I want to prove this last statement. In Psalm 49:15 we read that "God will ransom my soul from the power of the grave". The word translated "grave" is sheol, and the margin translates it "hell". Here, then, is a plain statement that people in hell are to be ransomed from hell. When Jesus died he was for
death, while uellenna, of the New Testament, is a picture or illustration of the seeond death, whirh mean"
+
three days in hell, and Peter tells us that God left not his soul in hell, but raised him from the dead. (Acts 2:31,32) Again, in Revelation 20:13 we read: "Death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them." In all these cases the word "hell" is sheol or hades, and not gehenna.
everlasting destruction or annihilation.
+
Now let us see what is meant by the words of our text. "If thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: for it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than, having two eyes, to be cast into hell fire."
Vhat is the particular difference between .unmic
+
In 1 John 2:16 we read: "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." As here used, the word "world" means the Devil's organization; and hence the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the pride of life originate with the Devil and are not pleasing to the Father. The lust of the eyes refers to those things that we see with our eyes and lust for, or desire, which, if obtained, would not be pleasing to God and would hinder us from obtaining the kingdom.
and serond death? The answer is that Adamic dl'atil
+
Let us examine some of the uses of this word "lust" as given to us in God's Word. The children of Israel fell a lusting for flesh while wandering in the wilderness, and God gave them quails to eat. (Num. 11:4) Jesus warned his followers against looking on a woman to lust after her. (Matt. 5:28) Again, in James 4:5 we read: "The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy." Thus we see that envy is lust. Also in 1 Timothy 6:9 are these words: "They that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, ... for the love of money is the root of all [forms of] evil." And still again, in 2 Timothy 4:3 we read: "The time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching cars." Now what does this mean? It means that the time will come when men will stubbornly resist the truth, will not listen to it, and will lust after or desire teachers who will preach just what they want to hear, teachers whose ears are itching to know just what their audiences want them to preach, and who will not preach otherwise for fear of losing their salaries.
is temporary destruction, likened to sll'ep, because a
+
Now we have an excellent idea of what the word}}
sleeping person generally awakens. llany texts speak
 
of the Adamic death as sleep. Thc seeond death is
 
never raUed sleep, for the reason that therE' is no
 
awakening from the second death, and not even a
 
 
 
173
 
 
 
promise or any hope of a resurrection for those who
 
go into it. They are rompletely and for ever destroyed,
 
and the apostle speaks of this as everlasting destruction. On the other hand, all who die the Adamic
 
death, and go into sheol or hades, will be awakened.
 
I want to prove this last statement. In Psalm 49: 15
 
we read that "God will ransom my soul from the
 
power of the grave". The word translated "grave"
 
is sheol, and the margin translates it "hell". Here,
 
then, is a plain statement that people in hell are to be
 
ransomed from hell. When Jesus died he was for
 
three days in hell, and Peter tells us that God left
 
not his soul in hell, but raised him from the dead.
 
(Arts 2 : 31, 32) Again, in Revelation 20: 13 we read:
 
,. Death and hell delivered up the dead whirh were
 
in them. 0' In all these cases the word" hell" is sh eol
 
or hades, and not fjehcnna.
 
~ow lE't us see ,vhat is meant by the words of our
 
text. "If thine e~'e offend thee, pluck it out: for it
 
is hetter for thee to ellter into the kingdom of God
 
with one eye, than, having' two e:n's, to be cast into
 
hdl fire. 0'
 
In 1 J aIm 2: 16 we read: "For all that is in the
 
world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes,
 
and the pridr of life, is not of the Father, but is of
 
t he world." As here used, the word "world" means
 
the Devil's organization; and hence the lust of the
 
flesh and the lust of the eyes and the pride of life
 
originate with the Devil and are not pleasing to the
 
Father. The lust of the eyes refl'rs to those things
 
that we sec with our eyrs and lust for, or desire,
 
whieh, if obtained, would not be pleasing to God and
 
would hinder us from obtaining the kingdom.
 
Let us examine some of the uses of this word
 
"lust" as given to us in God's Yord. The children
 
of INrarl fell a lusting for flesh while wandering
 
in the wilderness, and God gave thl'm quails to eat.
 
(~um. 11: 4) Jesus warned his followers against
 
looking 011 a woman to lust after her. (1lat1. 5: 28)
 
.g·ain, in ,Tames -1 : 5 we read: "The spirit that dwelleth ill us lusteth to em'~'." Thus we see that envy is
 
lust. .:Iso in 1 Timoth:,' 6: 9 arc these words: "They
 
that will be rirh fall into temptation and a snare,
 
and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, ... for tlw
 
love of money is the root of all [forms of] evi I." And
 
still again, in 2 Timothy 4: 3 we read: "The time
 
will come when the:,' will not endure sound doctrine;
 
but after their own lusts shall they heap to themseln's
 
teaehers, having itf'hing cars." Now what does this
 
mean? It means that the time will rome wlwn men
 
will stubborn]:,' resist the truth, will not listen to it,
 
and will lust after or desire teachl'rs who will preach
 
just what they ,vant to hear, teachers whose ears arc
 
itching to know just what their audiences want them
 
to preach, and who will not preach otherwise for fear
 
of losing their salaries.
 
Xow we have an excellent idea of what the word
 

Latest revision as of 12:51, 24 October 2020

This page has been proofread


JUNE 1, 1929
The WATCH TOWER
173
the city of Jerusalem. It was a deep valley with a high and precipitous cliff on the Jerusalem side. Not only was all waste and rubbish burned here, but also the carcasses of dead animals, such as cats, dogs, horses, etc., were thrown into this valley, to be destroyed. The city ordinance was that nothing that had life should be cast into the valley. Thus we can see that it could not possibly represent eternal torment, because nothing that had life was ever cast into it. History also tells us that the dead bodies of the worst criminals were denied a proper burial and were likewise thrown into this valley and there completely destroyed.

To destroy this rubbish and these carcasses, a fire was always kept burning there. Many cities in the United States have just such places for the destruction of the rubbish of the city at the present time. The speaker has seen several of them, and each one has always been a valley or some depression. The dead carcasses and other waste matter thrown into these valleys would breed pestilence, and so it was customary to sprinkle brimstone over these, which not only served as a disinfectant but also hastened the complete destruction of the carcasses, since brimstone will burn more destructively than any other known substance. This fire was not permitted to be quenched. To quench a fire means to forcibly put it out. When a fire burns up everything and goes out for the reason that there is nothing more to burn, that fire is not a quenched fire. Let it be noted, then, that when Jesus spoke of 'the fire that is never quenched', he did not mean that the fire would never go out, but he did mean that nobody would be permitted to put it out, to quench it. Thus, we can see that this fire pictures the complete destruction of that which was put into the fire, and thus becomes the best possible picture of the "everlasting destruction" of all those wilful sinners who are to be destroyed in the second death. This fire that is never quenched is identically the same thing as the lake of fire and brimstone mentioned several times in Revelation. And in most positive language the lake of fire and brimstone is declared to be "the second death". - Rev. 20:14; 21:8. Now note the fact that sheol, of the Old Testament, and hades, of the New Testament, both correctly translated "hell" and "grave", refer to the Adamic death, while gehenna, of the New Testament, is a picture or illustration of the second death, which means everlasting destruction or annihilation. What is the particular difference between Adamic and second death? The answer is that Adamic death is temporary destruction, likened to sleep, because a sleeping person generally awakens. Many texts speak of the Adamic death as sleep. The seeond death is never called sleep, for the reason that there is no awakening from the second death, and not even a

promise or any hope of a resurrection for those who go into it. They are completely and for ever destroyed, and the apostle speaks of this as everlasting destruction. On the other hand, all who die the Adamic death, and go into sheol or hades, will be awakened. I want to prove this last statement. In Psalm 49:15 we read that "God will ransom my soul from the power of the grave". The word translated "grave" is sheol, and the margin translates it "hell". Here, then, is a plain statement that people in hell are to be ransomed from hell. When Jesus died he was for three days in hell, and Peter tells us that God left not his soul in hell, but raised him from the dead. (Acts 2:31,32) Again, in Revelation 20:13 we read: "Death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them." In all these cases the word "hell" is sheol or hades, and not gehenna. Now let us see what is meant by the words of our text. "If thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: for it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than, having two eyes, to be cast into hell fire." In 1 John 2:16 we read: "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." As here used, the word "world" means the Devil's organization; and hence the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the pride of life originate with the Devil and are not pleasing to the Father. The lust of the eyes refers to those things that we see with our eyes and lust for, or desire, which, if obtained, would not be pleasing to God and would hinder us from obtaining the kingdom. Let us examine some of the uses of this word "lust" as given to us in God's Word. The children of Israel fell a lusting for flesh while wandering in the wilderness, and God gave them quails to eat. (Num. 11:4) Jesus warned his followers against looking on a woman to lust after her. (Matt. 5:28) Again, in James 4:5 we read: "The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy." Thus we see that envy is lust. Also in 1 Timothy 6:9 are these words: "They that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, ... for the love of money is the root of all [forms of] evil." And still again, in 2 Timothy 4:3 we read: "The time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching cars." Now what does this mean? It means that the time will come when men will stubbornly resist the truth, will not listen to it, and will lust after or desire teachers who will preach just what they want to hear, teachers whose ears are itching to know just what their audiences want them to preach, and who will not preach otherwise for fear of losing their salaries.

Now we have an excellent idea of what the word